How this was produced
✓ OCF task decomposition
✓ Activity-Skill Based Costing
✓ Bot / Borrow / Build / Buy routing
✓ Human judgement retained, not assumed
Tap any role for its verdict and the figures behind it - or take the 5-question match below.
The finding

Every figure is platform output, not assertion

Where readers land

Most-matched roles

Live in production. This session's matches below.

What do you think?
The shape of it

Losing ground - transforming - gaining

You choose what's next

Which sector should the platform forecast next?

The method, if you want it

How the platform reaches a verdict

The method is visible on purpose. It is what makes this reproducible rather than an opinion.

OCF - decompose the role to its tasks +
ASBC - price each task +
Activity-Skill Based Costing allocates the role's fully loaded annual cost across its sub-tasks by effort share, so every routing decision and every value figure carries a real cost weight.
4B - route each task +
Every sub-task is routed to Bot, Borrow, Build, or Buy by its substitutability, judgement load, relationship dependence, accountability weight, and data sensitivity. The verdict is the cost-weighted pattern of those routes.
Confidence, horizon, and value +
Confidence measures how decisively a role's sub-tasks sit inside their assigned routes. The horizon band is a model projection from exposure, never a dated countdown. Per-seat value is loaded cost times automatable-cost share; company-level impact and payback are a labelled scenario on stated assumptions, shown as ranges.
The full analysis

Now read why, role by role.

The deep forecast below decomposes each role to the task, prices it, routes it through the 4B framework, maps the delivery geography, and lays out the board decision and the human picture.

↓ The interactive sector forecast